Making Do w/ the Sauce

A New and Improved Way to Play Cinccino Control
Cinccino Control now comes equipped with a “shell game” (and more).

Hey there readers, I’ve been invited back to write again following my first article and I’m beyond excited to do so! I’m particularly enthusiastic because I get to share with you all a currently unknown variant of Cinccino Control, which has quickly become one of my favorite decks of the current Standard format.


Following the Limitless Series, after just barely whiffing the invitational, I was burned out. I had no motivation to play Standard, Expanded, or really engage in any competitive play. I’d join the occasional online tournament, wanting to keep myself sharp, but I was mostly motivated by the prize support. Like many people, I gravitated toward the Legacy format on PTCGO. I had fun creating some funny Stall and Mill decks, most of which were not great but I was enjoying myself. However, I was quickly thrown back into the Standard mindset when my friend Joel Stroeve introduced to me the idea of a Cinccino Control variant that focused heavily on Energy denial. I, of course, implored him to try Cinccino Mill. However, he said he wanted to try the idea out. The deck quickly became a focus within our friend group. Within a few days it went from an interesting pet deck to something we thought could become a high-tier archetype.

Previously, I’ve had my issues with Cinccino Control. Until now, it has been attempting to accomplish a similar goal to Pidgeotto Control’s, where you attempt to hand lock the opponent late game. However, I found multiple issues with the archetype.

Firstly, hand lock often wants to pull off what is sometimes referred to as the “Exodia” turn, where the hand Control player typically wants to: (1) use Reset Stamp late game, then (2) Chip-Chip Ice Axe, followed by (3) removing the cards the opponent got from the Reset Stamp with either Mars or Jessie & James, and (4) finish it off by using Articuno-GX’s Cold Crush-GX attack in order to remove any Energy off an Active attacker. The exact line of play obviously varies on the situation, but the objective is to leave your opponent with no hand, a bad topdeck, and something useless stuck in the Active position. From there, the Control player could use Oranguru’s Resource Management attack to continuously retrieve and play Chip-Chip Ice Axe to infinitely lock their opponent for the rest of the game.

However, this “Exodia” turn has been harder and harder to completely pull off with such a strong presence of Marnie and Reset Stamp in the meta. A well-timed hand disruption from the opponent can quickly ruin Control’s chances of securing a lock, and it can prove difficult to recover from such a situation.

From there, the Control player has to decide whether they want to (A) wait until they have a complete lock available to them at the risk of getting their hand disrupted or (B) attempt a lock earlier at the risk of the opponent getting lucky and drawing out of it. That level of uncertainty never made me happy when playing the deck.

Secondly, until now, Cinccino’s lock hasn’t been as infinite. Because the Control player needs to discard a card every turn with Cinccino’s Make Do Ability to get what they retrieved with Resource Management, they eventually run out of cards that they want to discard. This limits the Control player’s options toward the end of the game, and, if the Control player isn’t careful, their opponent might land an opportunistic Reset Stamp and deck them out. Unlike Mill, Control is playing for a longer game, recycling many more resources, and appreciates an infinite loop. Eventually the Control player is limited to 2 cards per Resource Management, as they need to discard the first to draw the other two.

Lastly, and this has been my biggest concern, consistency was always a problem for me when playing Cinccino Control. Until now, Cinccino Control lists have reduced their Pokémon search options, reduced their Supporter counts, and pared their Cinccino line. Individually, I don’t have a massive issue with these changes. However, all together, they’re very concerning. I continuously bricked and with fewer Cinccinos it was harder to set them up and that made Marnie all the more intimidating. I found the deck to be more fragile than Mill, and so I stuck with Cinccino’s more aggressive and consistent archetype.


I’m glad to say that most of these issues have been resolved with this new deck. It still has its flaws, but it is less susceptible to hand disruption, has the ability to infinitely loop its resources, and it’s surprisingly consistent, as all Cinccino lists should be. This deck has answers to most things in the meta, with multiple overwhelmingly favorable matchups and very few unfavorables.


To read this article, you must be an Underground member.

  • Already a member? Log in
  • Not a member? Join below ↓

Join Underground

Joining Underground gives you (and a friend!) complete access to our latest Underground articles plus their companion discussion sections to ask our writers questions.

New Underground (i.e., UG/★) articles are published on average 3× per week and are written by our staff of competitors + correspondents who report on an array of topics helpful for any Pokémon TCG player.

Choose a subscription:

Each subscription comes with automatic renewal, but you may disable automatic renewal at any time. If you are not completely satisfied with Underground, you can request a full refund within your first 30 days of joining—no questions asked.

FAQ

Q. Who writes for Underground?
A. Our current writing staff consists of:

  • 12× Worlds invitee · Playing since 2003 · “El Table”
  • 9× Worlds invitee · Playing since 2009 · “Purple Princess”
  • 8× Worlds invitee · Playing since 2010 · “The Worst Schemanske”
  • 8× Worlds invitee · Playing since 2012 · “1 of each Pokémon > 1 billion lions”
  • 8× Worlds invitee · Playing since 2010
  • 7× Worlds invitee · Playing since 2012 · “All the way from Brazil”
  • 6× Worlds invitee · Playing since 2012 · “Consistency is a tech for every matchup”
  • 4× Worlds invitee · Playing since 2011 · “Bee Revenge is best served Cold”

Extended bios can be found on each author page.

Q. When are new Underground articles published?
A. There are on average three (3) new Underground articles published each week, Tuesday thru Thursday, at ~12 PM EDT (GMT-4). We schedule more content before major tournament weekends than after, so you may see four articles one week and then only two the next. Our objective is to help you prepare for events. A calendar of upcoming articles and events can be viewed here.

Q. What topics are included in Underground articles?
A. An Underground article could…

  • profile the best decks for an upcoming tournament
  • discuss how to play the crucial matchups
  • analyze decklists
  • talk about upcoming card releases
  • report on a first-hand tournament experience
  • offer tips for high-level play

…or include any combination of above! We cover a range of topics to help competitive players elevate their game. If you’ve never read an Underground article before, start here: 👉 these ones are free to read.

Q. Do your articles apply to Juniors and Seniors?
A. While our focus is on Masters play, our commentary is applicable for all age divisions. Many of our writers have earned Worlds invitations as Juniors and/or Seniors, and many have also coached Juniors and Seniors, so we have experience in navigating those divisions. Please ask if you ever read an article and would like to clarify how it applies to Juniors or Seniors.

Q. How can I ask your writers questions?
A. You can connect with our writers in three ways:

  1. in the discussion sections for each article,
  2. by messaging through our forum,
  3. or via social media, like Twitter or Facebook, if the writer mentions they are open to connecting that way.

We encourage you to reach out whenever you have questions.

Q. What happens after I join?
A. The current page will refresh and you will have immediate access to all of our Underground content.

Q. Can I upgrade or downgrade my subscription?
A. Your subscription can be upgraded, downgraded, canceled, or reenabled at any time. If you upgrade, you will be immediately switched over to and charged for the new plan, minus a credit for unused time on your current subscription. If you downgrade, you will be switched over to the new plan after your current subscription ends. To manage your subscription, visit your payment profile.

Q. How do I add a friend to my subscription?
A. To add a friend to an existing subscription, enter their SixPrizes username in the Shared Account field on your user profile. If your friend doesn’t already have a SixPrizes account, they can register free.

Q. How can I request a refund?
A. If you would like to request a refund for your subscription—for any reason—you can do so within your first 30 days of joining Underground. Contact Adam with your account details, and he will issue your refund shortly.

Join Now

Choose a subscription:


Reader Interactions

4 replies

  1. To view this discussion or leave a reply, join Underground.